Good evening. Please write an essay with full citations on one of the following topics:


a) Are Norton extensions safe? Can you get spyware from Norton extensions? Are you at risk from spyware from extensions in general?


Norton extensions are browser add-ons that provide security and privacy features, such as blocking malicious websites, phishing, and tracking. They are designed to protect users from spyware, which is a type of malware that can monitor and steal personal information, such as passwords, credit card numbers, and browsing habits. However, Norton extensions are not immune to vulnerabilities and flaws that could compromise their functionality and expose users to spyware. For example, in 2019, researchers found that some Norton extensions had a critical flaw that allowed attackers to execute arbitrary code on the user's browser and access sensitive data (Zhang et al., 2019). Therefore, users should always keep their Norton extensions updated and review their permissions regularly. Moreover, users should be careful when installing other extensions from unknown or untrusted sources, as they could contain spyware or interfere with Norton extensions. Extensions in general pose a risk of spyware infection, as they can access various browser features and data, such as tabs, cookies, history, and bookmarks. Some extensions may also have hidden or malicious functionalities that can harm the user's system or privacy. Therefore, users should only install extensions from reputable sources, such as the official web stores of their browsers, and avoid downloading extensions from third-party websites or links. Users should also check the reviews and ratings of the extensions they want to install, and read their privacy policies and terms of service carefully. Furthermore, users should limit the number of extensions they use and uninstall the ones they do not need or use frequently.


References:


Zhang, Z., Han, X., Chen, Y., Zou, W., & Mao, B. (2019). All your browser-saved passwords could belong to us: A security analysis and a cloud-based new design. In Proceedings of the Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS). https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2019.23086


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

 A showdown battle is a term that can have different meanings depending on the context. In poker, a showdown battle is the placing of poker hands faceup on the table to determine the winner of a pot. In other situations, a showdown battle can refer to a decisive confrontation or contest between two or more parties that will finally settle a disagreement or a challenge  . For example, a showdown battle can be an important game or competition in sports, a political clash between opposing factions, or a military engagement between rival forces. Showdown battles are often tense, dramatic, and unpredictable, as they can result in victory or defeat for the participants.
Read more
 The Samnites were a confederation of tribes who lived in the mountainous region of central and southern Italy, known as Samnium. They spoke an Oscan language and were closely related to the Campanians, who had migrated from Samnium to the fertile plains of Campania. The Samnites were fierce warriors who often clashed with their neighbours, especially the Romans, who sought to expand their territory and influence in Italy. The Samnites and the Romans fought three wars between 343 and 290 BC, which are known as the Samnite Wars. The first war started when the Campanians asked Rome for protection against a Samnite attack. The Romans agreed and sent an embassy to the Samnites, demanding that they leave Campania alone. The Samnites refused and the war began. The war ended in 341 BC with a peace treaty that restored the status quo, but gave Rome control of Campania. The second war, also called the Great Samnite War, broke out in 326 BC when Rome tried to colonize Fregellae, a town on th...
Read more
 One of the key factors that influenced the outcome of the American Revolutionary War was the British strategy of dividing and conquering the colonies. The main architects of this strategy were General John Burgoyne and General Henry Clinton, who had different views on how to achieve this goal. Burgoyne favored a direct and aggressive approach, while Clinton preferred a more cautious and flexible one. In this essay, I will examine how the war might have turned out differently if either Burgoyne or Clinton had had control of British strategy during the conflict. Burgoyne's plan was to lead an army from Canada southward along the Hudson River, cutting off New England from the rest of the colonies. He hoped to meet up with another army under Clinton, who was supposed to advance northward from New York City. However, Clinton was reluctant to abandon his base and expose himself to a possible attack from Washington's army. He also had orders from London to send troops to the south, w...
Read more